NJ Clean Stream
njcleanstream.org
How to push your town to adopt a stormwater utility — a resident’s guide to the municipal process
Residents working in coordination with NJ Clean Stream have successfully advocated for stormwater utility adoption in multiple New Jersey communities. The process is real, the obstacles are surmountable, and the leverage points are accessible to any engaged resident willing to show up, ask questions, and maintain pressure over time. This is the practical guide.
Who decides: the municipal decision-making structure
Stormwater utility adoption requires two formal governmental actions: a resolution or ordinance by the municipal governing body establishing the utility, and a rate ordinance setting the fees. Both require action by your municipality’s governing body — town council, city council, township committee, or borough council.
The governing body acts on the recommendation of the municipal administrator or manager, the public works or engineering department, and in many cases the municipal attorney and financial advisor. Engaging these advisors in addition to elected officials is important for effective advocacy. In many municipalities, the first productive step is advocating for a feasibility study conducted by a consulting engineer — not a commitment to adoption, just a systematic analysis of options.
Mapping the political landscape
Likely supporters: Council members who have expressed concern about local flooding or water quality; members representing neighborhoods that experience frequent flooding; members with environmental backgrounds or who have supported environmental initiatives.
Likely opponents: Members closely aligned with local business associations or commercial property owners; members philosophically opposed to new fees; members wary of any action that generates constituent complaints.
Persuadable members: Members who are not yet engaged on the issue and do not have strong prior commitments. They respond to constituent pressure, clear information about benefits and costs, and evidence that comparable municipalities have implemented stormwater utilities successfully. These are your most important audience. Converting an enthusiastic opponent is unlikely to be the best use of your time.
The arguments that work
The cost argument works. Stormwater management is a genuine financial obligation the municipality will have to meet one way or another — through a dedicated fee or through the general tax levy. A stormwater utility does not create these costs; it provides a dedicated mechanism to fund costs that already exist. Present this as a question of financial management, not of whether to spend money on stormwater.
The legal defensibility argument matters. A stormwater fee is legally defensible as a fee — not a tax — and generates dedicated revenue that cannot be raided for other municipal purposes. This is a structural financial advantage that experienced municipal finance professionals understand and respect.
The equity argument resonates. Under general tax funding, every property owner pays for stormwater management regardless of how much impervious surface they contribute. A small house pays the same effective subsidy as a large commercial property with acres of impervious parking lot. A fee based on impervious surface is fairer — those who contribute more to the problem pay more for the solution.
Specific local problems are concrete. The intersection that floods every time it rains more than an inch. The stream that runs brown for days after a storm. The beach advisory that closed the shore for two weeks. Connect the stormwater utility to the solution of problems your community members have actually experienced.
Comparable community examples are persuasive. Research which NJ municipalities have established stormwater utilities, what their fee structures look like, how constituents have responded, and what stormwater improvements have resulted. Municipal officials are more likely to act when comparable communities have done so without catastrophe.
The objections you will face — and how to respond
“This is just a new tax by another name.” Stormwater fees have been reviewed by NJ courts and consistently upheld as fees, not taxes, when structured with a rational nexus to impervious surface and revenues used exclusively for stormwater management. Offer to share the relevant legal analysis and examples of municipalities that have successfully defended stormwater fees against tax challenges.
“We can’t afford to impose new fees.” The alternative is not zero cost — it is funding stormwater management from the general tax levy, which is already happening inadequately. The question is not whether to pay for stormwater management but how. A stormwater fee spreads cost more equitably and provides a more reliable revenue stream than general fund competition.
“Our storm drains are fine.” Ask whether the municipality is meeting all MS4 permit obligations. Ask about the maintenance status of storm drains and detention facilities. Ask about water quality conditions in local streams and the municipality’s legal exposure for stormwater-related water quality impairments. The “our drains are fine” response often reflects a lack of systematic condition assessment.
“The commercial property owners will fight this.” Large commercial property owners often express strong opposition during the public process — and then adapt once fees are in place, investing in on-site green infrastructure to reduce their fee obligations. A well-designed fee credit program gives commercial property owners a financial incentive to invest in green infrastructure that benefits both their bottom line and the community.
The practical advocacy sequence
Eight steps to stormwater utility adoption
- Step 1: Understand your municipality’s current stormwater situation. Research your MS4 permit and most recent annual report, publicly available. Understand what stormwater obligations the municipality has and whether it is meeting them. This gives you a factual foundation and demonstrates you are a serious, informed participant.
- Step 2: File a public records request. Request copies of any studies, reports, or correspondence related to stormwater utility consideration. Some municipalities have already done preliminary analysis that has not advanced to the governing body.
- Step 3: Request a meeting with your municipal administrator or public works director. Before engaging the governing body publicly, understand the staff-level perspective. What obstacles do staff see? What resources would they need? This builds a relationship with the staff who will ultimately implement any utility adopted.
- Step 4: Engage your council representative. Meet individually with the council member representing your neighborhood. Share what you’ve learned. Ask about their familiarity with stormwater utilities. Offer to provide information. Individual engagement is more effective than public comment alone in moving council members.
- Step 5: Organize your neighbors. A council that hears from ten residents on the same evening about stormwater management is more likely to act than one that hears from one. Talk to neighbors about local stormwater problems they have experienced.
- Step 6: Make a formal written request for a feasibility study. Submit a written request — signed by as many community members as you can organize — asking the governing body to commission a stormwater utility feasibility study. This is a modest, reasonable request that does not commit the municipality to adoption.
- Step 7: Maintain pressure through the feasibility study process. Feasibility studies take 6–12 months. Attend public meetings, ask for progress updates, and ensure the study addresses the full scope of stormwater management needs rather than providing a minimal analysis designed to support inaction.
- Step 8: Engage at the state level. Connect your local advocacy to NJ Clean Stream’s statewide advocacy for legislation requiring stormwater utility establishment. Letters from local advocates to state legislators — explaining why your community needs a stormwater utility and why a state mandate would help overcome local inertia — contribute to the political case for stronger state action.
What success looks like — and what comes after
Success is not just adoption of the ordinance. It is adoption with a fee structure adequate to fund real stormwater management needs, a green infrastructure credit program that creates meaningful incentives for private-sector investment, and transparent reporting so residents can see how revenues are spent.
After adoption, the work shifts to monitoring: Are stormwater fee revenues actually funding green infrastructure installation and gray infrastructure maintenance? Is the credit program functioning as designed? Are water quality conditions in local streams improving over time? Are combined sewer overflow frequencies declining in communities with combined sewers?
NJ Clean Stream tracks stormwater utility performance across the state. We want to hear from residents in communities that have adopted utilities — about what is working, what is not, and what improvements are needed.
This is Article 3 of 3 in NJ Clean Stream’s Stormwater Fees & Green Infrastructure Series. Article 1 explains what stormwater utilities are and why many NJ towns are refusing to establish them. Article 2 explains what green infrastructure looks like on the ground and why it works.